Showing posts with label bibliographic management. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bibliographic management. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 24, 2010

BibMe: Fast & Easy Bibliography Maker - MLA, APA, Chicago, Turabian - Free

BibMe: Fast & Easy Bibliography Maker - MLA, APA, Chicago, Turabian – Free

 BibMe is a free automatic bibliography generator that supports MLA, APA, Chicago, and Turabian formatting. BibMe leverages databases provided by Amazon, FindArticles, Yahoo! News, and CiteULike to quickly and accurately AutoFill citation information for you. BibMe will then format the citation information according to the rules and guidelines of the style guides. If you prefer, you can enter your citation information manually. BibMe also contains a quick citation guide to show students the correct syntax for citing in various formats.

BibMe: Fast & Easy Bibliography Maker - MLA, APA, Chicago, Turabian - Free

Friday, January 15, 2010

iCyte - Home

iCyte - Home 

# iCyte enables you to highlight and save text on any webpage, allowing you to recall the most relevant information. You can save sections of webpages or the whole thing. # Powerful search tools Webpages you Cyte are saved on our server, letting you return to your research even if the webpage has been deleted or modified. # Simple user sharing Invite colleagues and friends to join your projects, discover new research, and share information.

iCyte - Home

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

MPG/SFX: Using COinS

MPG/SFX: Using COinS 

What are COinS?

ContextObjects in Spans (COinS) is a method to embed bibliographic information about available references into the HTML code of a web page by using a "span" element. Span elements are hidden in the HTML code and therefore internet users won't notice COinS unless they have installed a modern browser software (e.g. Firefox) and a specific extension which discovers the hidden information. COinS re-use the elements defined by the OpenURL standard, e.g. the article title is marked as "rft.atitle". This is how HTML code looks like with COinS element included:

MPG/SFX: Using COinS

Friday, February 27, 2009

Mendeley Snags $2 Million In Early-Stage Funding For Research Paper Management Tool

 

Mendeley Snags $2 Million In Early-Stage Funding For Research Paper Management Tool

 

by Robin Wauters on February 25, 2009

Mendeley, makers of a desktop and web application designed to make it easier for academics to manage and discover relevant research papers on any topic, has raised $2 million in early-stage funding from some high-profile investors, including Stefan Glänzer, early seed investor in and former Chairman of Last.fm, former Executive VP of Digital Strategy and Business Development for Warner Music Group Alex Zubillaga and ASI, the investment vehicle of Skype’s former founding engineers.

The connection with the popular social music network Last.fm doesn’t stop there, since the company is pushing to become the “Last.fm for research”, which means the startup essentially aims to enable academics to manage and sharing their research paper inventory and at the same time discover like-minded people and papers thanks to a recommendation and matching algorithm.

I registered for the service and downloaded the Windows version of the desktop app (it’s available for Mac OSX and Linux too) to give it a whirl. First thing I noticed is that you can easily invite fellow academics from your network to join Mendeley based on existing accounts for LinkedIn, Gmail, Windows Live, etc. I also took note of the fact that your profile settings, which include information about your field of research, a CV, etc. automatically has you signed up for the company newsletter, which I think should be optional. My entirely fake public profile can be located here.

The desktop app is actually quite nice: after installation, you can import PDF files using the tool’s “Automatic Medata Extraction” or import your existing library from EndNote XML, BibTeX or RIS files. Mendeley also features a Word Plugin which lets you insert citations and create formatted bibliographies in documents using Microsoft Word 2003/2007. Academics can also upload their own research papers and syncing files and information with the web-based version with just one click of the mouse. Mendeley also boasts features that let members connect with their peers online, and - taking a page from Facebook - the tool also features a newsfeed that displays newly shared or uploaded documents etc.

Mendeley claims to have “scrobbled” data on almost 3 million research papers in just two months, so it’s likely to become one hell of a resource if growth continues and enough academics take notice.

Similar services include Labmeeting (which we likened to a “social network for scientists”), Academia.edu (which we likened to a “Geni for researchers”) and Questia.

If you know of any others, please share in comments.

Others: 

Another company that is related here is Biowizard. While it does not work within the context of a research paper for footnoting, there are a lot of Digg-like social features to help find the best and most relevant research. More importantly, it also includes proprietary data on research presented at conferences, which is usually 1-2 years ahead of when it gets formally published. As such, it is the only place to stay up to date on the most current happenings in biomedical research.

A non-software and download alternative is twidox. Focus is on documents rather than the social-networking and now has over 30.000 already.

scholarz.net which is also a German concept by the way.

For computer science, Eventseer (http://eventseer.net) provides an alternative take on social networking for researchers. We mine the web for existing relations between scientists and use the information to help users find upcoming conferences and events that are relevant for them, or even other researchers that they might be interested in following.

CiteULike is similar; it’s a website that allows the building of collaborative bibliographies.

Since we’re talking about Mendeley, it is also worth mentioning Papers, which attempts to be the iTunes of reference managers rather than the Last.fm. I’m using this at the moment, but it’s not without its problems, so I’m always looking for alternatives.

Other reference managers worthy of note are connotea (http://www.connotea.org/) and Zotero (http://www.zotero.org/).

A related type of program is a research collaboration system. Laboratree (http://www.laboratree.org) is a system facilitates collaboration within and between organizations.

wePapers and Zotero

ResearchGate.net, fast growing social network for scientists, strong especially life sciences.

Basecamp/ Backpack for scientists, then Lab Engine (http://www.labenginehq.com) might be of interest to you

research grant application to Grants.gov (for the federal dollars). Check out Cayuse and Subawards.com.

 

Mendeley Snags $2 Million In Early-Stage Funding For Research Paper Management Tool

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Zotero Blog » Blog Archive » Zotero 1.5 Beta Released: Join Us In The Clouds

 Zotero Blog » Blog Archive » Zotero 1.5 Beta Released: Join Us In The Clouds

Zotero 1.5 Beta Released: Join Us In The Clouds

Posted February 23rd, 2009 by Trevor

We are excited to announce two major releases. This morning the Zotero team launched both Zotero 1.5 and the first release of Zotero’s web application. Watch the screencast below for details on 1.5 and see the list below for a brief list of Zotero’s new features.

Zotero Blog » Blog Archive » Zotero 1.5 Beta Released: Join Us In The Clouds

Friday, February 6, 2009

Citeline

Citeline

Don't know how this differs from citseer or citeulike but its from MIT, so worth a look -- HSM

Citeline

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

BibSonomy

BibSonomy\

 

"not sure if this is better that CiteSeer or Cite U Like -- can never remember which is which -- but its another one" -- HSM

BibSonomy is a system for sharing bookmarks and lists of literature. When discovering a bookmark or a publication on the web, you can store it on our server. You can add tags to your post to retrieve it more easily. This is very similar to the bookmarks/favorites that you store within your browser. The advantage of BibSonomy is that you can access your data from whereever you are. Furthermore, you can discover more bookmarks and publications from your friends and other people.

This page shows you the latest updates of BibSonomy. Why dont you just try it yourself? After a free registration, you can organise your own bookmarks and publications, and discover related entries.

BibSonomy

Zotero: The Next-Generation Research Tool » Blog Archive » Analyze Your Zotero Data with the SEASR analytics plugin

 

« Publish Zotero Collections Online With Zotz

Analyze Your Zotero Data with the SEASR analytics plugin

February 2nd, 2009 by Trevor

Zotero just became an even more useful platform for research management. We are excited to announce Zotero’s first data mining plugin. The initial launch of SEASR Analytics for Zotero allows users to use SEASR’s author centrality analysis, author degree distribution analysis, and author hit analysis on items in their collections. These three functions are just the begining, but they already demonstrate the potential for leveraging SEASR’s data mining capabilities inside Zotero. Download the plugin today, and give it a try.

This entry was posted on Monday, February 2nd, 2009 at 11:40 am and is filed under News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Responses are currently closed, but you can trackback from your own site.

Zotero: The Next-Generation Research Tool » Blog Archive » Analyze Your Zotero Data with the SEASR analytics plugin

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

Yep

Yep

PDF storage site on the web -- need to take a look at this....

Yep

Monday, August 25, 2008

vfowler blog » soul searching on the web - in the clouds « Blog Archive

More citation stuff to look at.....HSM

vfowler blog » soul searching on the web - in the clouds « Blog Archive 

For citations, I’ve been using a few great tools. First, I rely on the wonderful and easy to use CiteMachine to generate standard bibliographic and in-text citations. Second, to automate the citation process as much as possible, I’ve recently been trying out Zotero which works alone on your computer.

In addition, for online reference management, I’m experimenting with CiteULike which is designed for scholarly papers, thanks Janette Treanor for pointing out this one; and thanks to Fiona Stace’s thread post, Connotea. Given the nature of the medium and the subject content, why anyone would record this information on their own computer beats me. Are we rocketeering towards cloud computing? (What is cloud computing? - on YouTube)

Finally, now it should be easy enough for me to access, retrieve, understand, contextualise and recall why I saved these resources any time in the foreseeable future. In my next post, annotations of the best 3 results sourced from my search query “winter dreaming” film screening. For evaluating sources of information, check out a later post.

References

The Ohio State University Libraries, (2007, September 19). Web Search Tools.
Retrieved August 22, 2008, from net.TUTOR website: http://liblearn.osu.edu/tutor/les5/

Cohen, L (2008, January). Boolean Searching on the Internet.
Retrieved August 22, 2008, from Internet Tutorials website: http://www.internettutorials.net/boolean.html

Google, (n.d.). Google Scholar Help.
Retrieved August 22, 2008, from Google Scholar website: http://scholar.google.com.au/intl/en/scholar/help.html

vfowler blog » soul searching on the web - in the clouds « Blog Archive

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Bibliographies - the lazy way « Gillian’s Learning and Qualifications Blog

"Need to look at the free versions of noodlebib, easybib and bibme" -- HSM

Bibliographies - the lazy way

Remember when writing essays, articles and academic papers meant last-minute chasing round the desk, the library and the kitchen drawer for that vital reference you quoted at least three times?  Bad temper, tears, kicked cats - all that has gone.  Or it should have gone.  These days, you can even hire someone to do all your citations for you at a very reasonable number of cents or dollars per page.

NoodleBibs Express is one of the best free sources of help for occasional references but you can also sign up to their main service for under a dollar a month.  EasyBib and BibMe are also useful for pre-degree-level work.

For more advanced academic work, most researchers will be gratefully aware that EBSCO now permits automatic export of citations - so all you have to do is remember to check the box to spare yourself hours of wondering which ‘Smith’ published that most helpful statistic on which you based your best paragraph.  You can also use free tools such as CiteULike, Zotero, KnightCite, or  Citation Builder.  Of these, Zotero is particularly useful for Firefox users as it sits in the browser.

More commercial and sophisticated products such as RefWorks and EndNote do exist although, if you are interested in lazy ways to get your bibliography done, you probably don’t need these.  As tools they are solid, but for most people brought up in an era of Web2.0 tools that make bookmarking, tagging and electronic ’sticky notes’ part of their lives, they are perhpas best used only if provided as part of a ‘free’ university library package.


Bibliographies - the lazy way « Gillian’s Learning and Qualifications Blog

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

PDF or ODF?

 

Some information taken from http://www.academicproductivity.com/blog/2007/on-metadata-indexing-and-mucking-around-with-pdfs/

 

OASIS OpenDocument Format (ODF) could be the solution for this. It seems that word processors are slowly taking  an interest in reference management. Word 2007 features a reference manager, although it is really primitive and not usable for serious academic use. OpenOffice has been behind ODF for a while. if ODF becomes a de-facto standard, we may not need to rely on PDF. And ODF is XML, so adding different fields that can be mined by reference managers shouldn’t be hard. ODF is overseen by the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards (OASIS). That way, the metadata is no longer an extension of the document: the entire document could be parsed and each component could contribute in its indexing. This would make easy to do what citeSeer is trying to do ‘the hard way’ (parsing author, title, etc out of the papers that we academic have in our homepages, and making them available and searchable). 

The need is there. I think the company/University dept. that gets this right will have a winner. For example, the Zotero forums express this need as follows:

(post by CuriousGeorge) Here is what I would like to do ideally:
1. Begin literature review on new topic using databases like JSTOR, Proquest, and Web of Science.
2. Use Zotero’s current “folder” icon in address bar to select articles of interest.
3. Zotero downloads citation information (this already works well), abstract (this often works), and the associated PDF file (with this option enabled in Zotero preferences, it currently works well in JSTOR but not other databases like Proquest).
4. Zotero stores all PDFs in one folder and automatically renames the PDFs based on the associated citation information in the format “Author, Year, Article Title.pdf” (or customized format selected by user).
5. PDFs are read in the browser window and notes are taken in the associated Zotero entry.
6. Zotero allows search in any combination of citation information, abstract/notes, and full text of website/PDF snapshots (stored locally).
7. Lit Review is built by creating new notes that synthesize various articles (these notes take advantage of the “related” option in Zotero to link back to the associated references).
8. The lit review notes and “related” citations are exported to a word processor.
9. The word processor is dynamically linked to the Zotero database for adding new citations and for searching the Zotero database for quotes/notes.