Monday, July 20, 2009

Th:Jefferson Encyclopedia

Th:Jefferson Encyclopedia 

Thomas Jefferson and his world by Monticello researchers and respected Jefferson scholars.

Only Thomas Jefferson Encyclopedia community scholars can write and edit articles; however, public users are encouraged to submit comments on the discussion pages. For more information, see Help.

Th:Jefferson Encyclopedia

Librarian Resources | LLRX.com

 Librarian Resources | LLRX.com

Librarian Resources

Subcategories of Librarian Resources

Librarian Resources | LLRX.com

Home - SciTopics

Home - SciTopics

About SciTopics

SciTopics is a free expert-generated knowledge-sharing service for the scientific community. It serves as an information and collaboration service for researchers.

SciTopics offers authors a dynamic, quick, informal yet authoritative online publication platform

Home - SciTopics

The Great Issues Forum | Great Issues Forum

The Great Issues Forum | Great Issues Forum

The Great Issues Forum is a new initiative at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, and presented by the Center for the Humanities. Funding for the initiative was provided by the 2007 Carnegie Corporation of New York's Academic Leadership Award, presented to Chancellor Matthew Goldstein. Each year, the Forum will explore critical issues of our time through a single thematic lens. Our inaugural theme is Power. In a series of high-profile, free public Conversations featuring artists, intellectuals, and policy makers, the Great Issues Forum is examining the ways in which various categories of power – political, economic, cultural, military, and educational – work in our increasingly globalized world. Subsequent themes for 2009-2011 will be "Faith" and "Place."
The Forum also hosts an online seminar with prominent guest bloggers, distinguished faculty, and select graduate students who will discuss a series of texts related to the annual theme.
The Great Issues Forum is designed to replicate the mission of The Graduate Center of the City University of New York – to educate the children of all people, to pursue enlightenment, and to disseminate knowledge for the benefit of all society. By turning the spotlight for a year on an in-depth examination of an issue of great cultural and political consequence, the Great Issues Forum hopes to stimulate new scholarly lines of inquiry, inform students and the public at large, and encourage civic engagement in their local communities and around the world.

The Great Issues Forum | Great Issues Forum

About Us - The AboutJobs.com Network

About Us - The AboutJobs.com Network 

The AboutJobs.com Network

Founded in 1996, AboutJobs.com is an on-line recruitment network that provides career resources and employment opportunities to high school and college students, resort and hospitality staff, expatriates and international job seekers, part-time workers, and adventure seekers.

AboutJobs.com offers services to employers looking to use the power of the Internet to find candidates for hard to fill positions across North America and the world. AboutJobs.com provides employers access to hundreds of thousands of candidates each month who are looking for internships, summer jobs, resort and hospitality employment and overseas work. AboutJobs.com has also created the GeoJobs™ e-recruiting application that allows employers to simultaneously post job openings on their internal corporate Web sites and the AboutJobs.com network of sites.

About Us - The AboutJobs.com Network

Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Yet Another Plan To Change Copyright Law To Protect Newspapers | Techdirt

Yet Another Plan To Change Copyright Law To Protect Newspapers | Techdirt 

Yet Another Plan To Change Copyright Law To Protect Newspapers

from the please,-someone,-think-this-through dept

Last week, we wrote about Judge Posner's troubling idea that copyright law should be changed to protect newspapers, and this week, a columnist for the Cleveland Plain Dealer is backing the same basic idea as proposed by two brothers, David and Daniel Marburger. One is a First Amendment lawyer and the other an economist -- and I'm stunned that both would get things so backwards. Their specific proposal is that:

  • Aggregators would reimburse newspapers for ad revenues associated with their news reports.
  • Injunctions would bar aggregators' profiting from newspapers' content for the first 24 hours after stories are posted.
Both are incredibly shortsighted and backwards and would do significantly more harm than good. Both are based on a fundamental misunderstanding of how news and the internet works. Even more amusing? They try to "anticipate the rebuttal" and get that totally wrong, claiming that people will complain: "Newspapers want to monopolize the truth."
No. That's not the complaint at all. The problem is much more basic than that. It's that newspapers (and the Marburgers, apparently) are confused about how people communicate and what business they're in. They think -- incorrectly -- that newspapers are in the business of delivering the news. But that's just a small part of it. They're really in the business of building a community of folks, who they then sell to advertisers. As such, they need to be doing two things, both of which this plan makes harder:
  • They need to provide more value to their community, so they stick around
  • They need to attract more people to their community
Now go back and look at the Marburgers' plan, and realize how backwards it is. It takes away value from the community by making it harder for those in the community to share and spread the news themselves -- a vital part of how people interact with the news these days. And just how do you define an "aggregator"? If someone Twitters a link to a news story... does Twitter become an aggregator? On top of that, barring others from "profiting" off the news for 24 hours simply limits the ability of others to help newspapers get more traffic.
Of course, in the meantime, Jay Rosen points us to Josh Young's analysis of what would almost certainly happen if newspapers could block others from linking to them. It's essentially what we've suggested in the past: if you give short-sighted and clueless newspapers the tools to block others from sending them traffic, that just opens wide the market for their smarter competitors to gladly accept all that traffic. Hell, it appears that Reuters recognizes the future. The folks there must be salivating over the idea that others would lock up their content and leave the playing field wide open to Reuters to scoop up all that traffic.

Yet Another Plan To Change Copyright Law To Protect Newspapers | Techdirt

OASIS

OASIS 

OASIS aims to provide an authoritative ‘sourcebook’ on Open Access, covering the concept, principles, advantages, approaches and means to achieving it. The site highlights developments and initiatives from around the world, with links to diverse additional resources and case studies. As such, it is a community-building as much as a resource-building exercise. Users are encouraged to share and download the resources provided, and to modify and customize them for local use. Open Access is evolving, and we invite the growing world-wide community to take part in this exciting global movement

OASIS